🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where Black people are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since those days, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to scrub Black history and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Establishments who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of minor insults, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.