🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.